FOX NEWS: Pittsburgh Steelers Head Coach Makes Alarming Russell Wilson Admission After Justin Fields Call
The NFL offseason is never short on drama, but the latest comments from Pittsburgh Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin regarding star quarterback Russell Wilson have taken the spotlight. After the Steelers faced off against the Chicago Bears, where Justin Fields showed promise, Tomlin’s admission about Wilson raised eyebrows across the league. His comments came after the Pittsburgh defense was tasked with stopping Fields, but it’s what he said afterward about the Denver Broncos’ signal caller, Wilson, that has left fans and analysts alike wondering what’s next for the Steelers’ coaching staff and their game planning moving forward.
Mike Tomlin’s Surprising Admission
Mike Tomlin is widely regarded as one of the NFL’s most experienced and composed head coaches. Over his long career, he has consistently kept his emotions in check, rarely letting candid comments slip out in the heat of the moment. However, during a press conference following the Steelers’ game against the Bears, Tomlin surprised everyone with a startling admission about Russell Wilson.
The context for Tomlin’s comments was centered around Justin Fields, the second-year quarterback for the Chicago Bears, and how he had given the Steelers defense trouble during the game. Fields had shown flashes of brilliance, making several jaw-dropping plays, both with his arm and legs. His ability to extend plays and make dangerous throws while on the move was a reminder of how unpredictable mobile quarterbacks can be. Fields’ performance was a key factor in the game, and Tomlin made it clear that the Steelers’ defense struggled to contain him.
But it was Tomlin’s follow-up comments on Wilson that sent shockwaves through the football world. While speaking about how mobile quarterbacks like Fields could pose significant challenges, Tomlin admitted, “In some ways, I miss the old Russell Wilson—before he became the guy who’s so locked in to doing it his way in Denver. I can’t help but think we could have used that version in our game planning.”
For context, Wilson had long been regarded as one of the league’s most dynamic quarterbacks with the Seattle Seahawks, often turning scrambles into highlight-reel touchdowns. His mobility, paired with a strong arm and remarkable decision-making, made him one of the NFL’s elite quarterbacks. However, since his move to the Denver Broncos, Wilson has been under scrutiny for his less-than-impressive performances in his first season with Denver, despite the team making a significant trade to acquire him.
Tomlin’s comments have raised many questions. While it’s clear he was discussing the challenge of facing quarterbacks like Fields, the fact that he brought up Wilson in this context suggests that there might be some dissatisfaction with how Wilson has been performing, particularly when it comes to dealing with the type of quarterback that poses unique challenges to defenses in today’s NFL.
The Fallout: Why Tomlin’s Comments Are Alarming
At first glance, Tomlin’s words might seem harmless. After all, every coach has their preferences when it comes to the kind of quarterback they prefer to game plan against. However, in the context of the NFL, where every word spoken in public can be dissected and analyzed, Tomlin’s statement could have far-reaching consequences.
Firstly, Tomlin’s comments about Russell Wilson may indicate a deeper frustration with the Pittsburgh Steelers’ current defensive approach. The Steelers’ defense has historically been one of the league’s most dominant units, known for their ability to shut down both the pass and the run. But with the evolution of the NFL towards more mobile quarterbacks, teams that once prided themselves on a “traditional” defensive style have had to adapt. Tomlin’s reference to “the old Russell Wilson” seems to suggest that the coach is longing for a quarterback who can extend plays and make something out of nothing, something Wilson used to do consistently during his time in Seattle.
But more alarming is the fact that Tomlin might be signaling a more significant issue with the Steelers’ game plan or even personnel. If he misses the old version of Russell Wilson—a quarterback who could break off big plays with his legs and create opportunities even when the defense was in perfect coverage—it could point to an underlying problem with the Steelers’ ability to handle mobile quarterbacks.
The NFL has seen a steady influx of athletic quarterbacks who can challenge defenses both in the pocket and on the move. Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, Kyler Murray, and Justin Fields are just a few examples of quarterbacks who present unique challenges to defensive coordinators. The Steelers have struggled at times to contain these types of quarterbacks, and Tomlin’s admission suggests that he recognizes this weakness.
The idea that Tomlin is longing for a “better” version of Wilson also hints at the fact that the Steelers’ coaching staff might be questioning their defensive scheme’s ability to deal with mobile quarterbacks. This could be a sign that the Steelers need to reassess their defensive strategy moving forward. It’s no secret that their defense has been built around a strong pass rush and solid secondary play. But in a league where the quarterback is increasingly the focal point of every offense, this traditional approach might no longer be enough.
A New Era for Russell Wilson?
Wilson’s fall from grace in Denver has been one of the most talked-about storylines in recent seasons. Once considered one of the elite quarterbacks in the NFL, Wilson’s tenure with the Broncos has been marked by disappointing performances and reports of tension between him and his new head coach, Nathaniel Hackett. The Broncos traded a significant amount of assets to acquire Wilson, including multiple first-round picks, but have yet to see a return on that investment.
Wilson’s struggles have led many to wonder if his best years are behind him. After all, at age 34, Wilson is no longer the young, agile playmaker he once was. His mobility has seemingly diminished, and his ability to elevate the Broncos’ offense has been questioned by critics. It’s clear that the Broncos are not getting the same version of Wilson they once had in Seattle, and Tomlin’s comments imply that the Steelers’ coach recognizes that reality as well.
If Wilson continues to struggle in Denver, it may change the landscape of the AFC West and the NFL as a whole. The Broncos are locked into Wilson for the foreseeable future, but the franchise is starting to question if their quarterback can still be the player he once was. Tomlin’s remarks show that even seasoned NFL coaches are starting to acknowledge that the Wilson they saw in Seattle is not the same player they see in Denver.
Conclusion: What’s Next for the Steelers?
Mike Tomlin’s admission regarding Russell Wilson, though seemingly innocuous on the surface, has ignited a firestorm of conversation. As the Steelers continue to fine-tune their game plans for the upcoming season, Tomlin’s comments about Wilson—coupled with the team’s struggles against mobile quarterbacks—could signal a shift in how the Steelers approach defensive matchups moving forward. While Tomlin’s comments about Wilson might suggest a desire for a more mobile and dynamic quarterback, it also raises critical questions about Pittsburgh’s ability to adapt to a changing NFL. Will the Steelers continue to rely on traditional defensive schemes, or will they evolve to contain the new breed of quarterbacks? Only time will tell, but Tomlin’s words indicate that change may be on the horizon.